General
Protests 84541-G, etc., of Gimbel Bros. (New York)
3 Cust. Ct. 366·United States Customs Court·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the Second Division,
August 30, 1939
No. 42026.
Protests 84541-G, etc., of Gimbel Bros. (New York).
[MAJORITY — Tilson, J.]
Opinion by
Tilson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel filet laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy laces like those passed upon in United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and embroidered articles and embroidered-net handkerchiefs similar to the merchandise the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365 T. D. 43809) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.