General
KIRKPATRICK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSOURI, et al. v. PREISLER et al.
385 U.S. 450·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KIRKPATRICK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSOURI, et al. v. PREISLER et al.
No. 738.
Decided January 9, 1967.
Norman H. Anderson, Attorney General of Missouri, and J. Gordon Siddens and Thomas J. Downey, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.
Paul W. Preisler, pro se, and for other appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.