Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ross ABBOTT, et al., petitioners, v. Harris PASTIDES, et al., 2019 — 139 S. Ct. 1292 · caselaw · US
Constitutional Law · MBE-tested
Ross ABBOTT, et al., petitioners, v. Harris PASTIDES, et al.
139 S. Ct. 1292203 L. Ed. 2d 428·Supreme Court of the United States·2019
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ross ABBOTT, et al., petitioners,
v.
Harris PASTIDES, et al.
No. 18-704.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 4, 2019.
Motion of First Amendment Clinics at Duke Law, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of The South Carolina ACLU, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.