Contracts · MBE-tested
Charles M. Aikman, Respondent, v. Wahnetah Silk Company, Appellant
192 N.Y. 561·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles M. Aikman, Respondent, v. Wahnetah Silk Company, Appellant.
Aikman v. Wahnetah Silk Co., 120 App. Div. 884, affirmed.
(Argued April 23, 1908;
decided May 19, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of tin, Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 10, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.
Ralph Royall for appellant.
William B. Hurd, Jr., for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, J.