Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Andrew M. Rollins, Respondent, v. The Co-operative Building Bank, Appellant, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 525 · caselaw · US
General
Andrew M. Rollins, Respondent, v. The Co-operative Building Bank, Appellant
184 N.Y. 525·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Andrew M. Rollins, Respondent, v. The Co-operative Building Bank, Appellant.
Rollins v. Co-operative Building Bank, 98 App. Div. 606, affirmed.
(Argued January 19, 1906;
decided February 13, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 29,1904, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury and granting a new trial.
E. G. Bullard and George E. Waldo for appellant.
J. K. Long and Thomas S. Fagan for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against defendant on the stipulation, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Dissenting; Hiscook, J,