Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. et al., 1941 — 313 U.S. 543 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. et al.
313 U.S. 543·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 535.
United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. et al.
April 28, 1941.
[MAJORITY]
It is ordered that the opinion filed March 31, 1941, be amended by inserting in the first paragraph on page 6, after the word “question,” the following: “not only are above ordinary high water mark but also claim that they”.
Opinion reported as amended, 312 U. S. 592.