Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry Kremer, Respondent, v. New York Edison Company, Appellant, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 557 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Henry Kremer, Respondent, v. New York Edison Company, Appellant
186 N.Y. 557·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry Kremer, Respondent, v. New York Edison Company, Appellant.
Kremer v. New York Edison Co., 103 App. Div. 433, affirmed.
(Argued October 11, 1906;
decided October 26, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second .judicial department, entered March 27, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received through the negligence of defendant.
71. Snowden Marshall and Frederick F. Fishel for appellant.
Stephen C. Baldwin for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Absent: Gray, J.