Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
County of Wayne v. United States, 1967 — 389 U.S. 972 · caselaw · US
General
County of Wayne v. United States
389 U.S. 972·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 599.
County of Wayne v. United States.
Aloysius J. Suchy and William F. Koney for petitioner.
Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Joseph Kovner and Edward Lee Rogers for the United States.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and T. Carl Holbrook and William D. Dexter, Assistant Attorneys General, for the State of Michigan, and Julius C. Pliskow for the City of Detroit, as amici curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.