Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Kimura et al. v. MacArthur et al., 1948 — 335 U.S. 898 · caselaw · US
General
Kimura et al. v. MacArthur et al.
335 U.S. 898·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 267,
Mise.
Kimura et al. v. MacArthur et al.
John W. Crandall, William Logan, Jr., Ben Bruce Blakeney, John G. Brannon and George Yamaoka for petitioners.
[MAJORITY]
The motions are denied. See the opinion announced today in Hirota v. MacArthur, 338 U. S. 197.
[The reporting of the opinion of the Court in this case was delayed pending announcement of the opinion of Mr. Justice Douglas, which was announced on June 27,1949.]