Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James Brackett et al., Appellants, v. George G. Wyman et al., Respondents, 1872 — 48 N.Y. 667 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
James Brackett et al., Appellants, v. George G. Wyman et al., Respondents
48 N.Y. 667·New York Commission of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Brackett et al., Appellants, v. George G. Wyman et al., Respondents.
(Argued September 22, 1871;
decided January term, 1872.)
Plaintiffs and defendants each had judgments against one John R. Wyman. Certain real estate of said Wyman was being sold at a foreclosure sale upon a mortgage, which was a prior lien to the judgment. Plaintiffs assigned to defendants their judgment, and agreed not to bid at the foreclosure sale, upon defendants executing to them an agreement to pay $600 in installments. Plaintiffs did not bid and the premises were purchased by defendants. Plaintiffs brought suit upon the agreement. Held, that plaintiffs’ agreement to abstain from bidding was unlawful as against public policy, and rendered the whole contract void.
O. M. Benedict for the appellants.
Chwrles C. Judd for the respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Gray, C., reads for affirmance.
All concur. Judgment affirmed, with costs.