Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. McDowell, 1808 — 8 U.S. 316 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. McDowell
8 U.S. 3164 Cranch 316·Supreme Court of the United States·1808
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
United States v. McDowell.
Jurisdiction in error.
In deciding whether the matter in dispute he sufficient to sustain the jurisdiction of this court, it will look to the sum due upon the condition of a bond, and not to the penalty.
Error to the District Court for the district of Kentucky, in an action of debt for $20,000, the penalty of an official bond given by the defendant, as marshal of that district, for the faithful execution of the duties of his office by himself and his deputies. The defendant pleaded performance generally. The United States, in their replication, assigned a special breach of the condition of the bond, in not paying over to the United States the sum of $328. *The judgment below was against the United States, who sued out poi ^ the present writ of error. But— L
[MAJORITY]
This Court, without argument, decided that it had no jurisdiction, the matter in dispute being of less value than $2000.