Administrative
George Mellis, Respondent, v. Andreas Papadopoulos, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent. Cema Construction Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant
216 A.D.2d 153628 N.Y.S.2d 1012·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1995·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George Mellis, Respondent, v Andreas Papadopoulos, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent. Cema Construction Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.
[628 NYS2d 1012]
[MAJORITY]
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered on or about September 30, 1994, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Lehner, J., without costs and disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rubin, Asch and Williams, JJ.