Criminal Law · MBE-tested

Gloria Jean BILDERBACK v. STATE of Arkansas

318 Ark. 323888 S.W.2d 290·Arkansas Supreme Court·1994·AR

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Gloria Jean BILDERBACK v. STATE of Arkansas CR 94-1034 888 S.W.2d 290 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 17, 1994 Gene O’Daniel, for appellant. No response. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Gloria Jean Bilderback, by her attorney, Gene O’Daniel, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. Her attorney, Gene O’Daniel, admits by motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.