General

In the Matter of the Application of Moses Valentine to Compel Samuel D. Lasky, Attorney and Counsellor-at-Law, to Turn over to the Petitioner Certain Moneys in the Possession of the Respondent, and to Determine What Lien, if Any, the Respondent Has for Legal Services Rendered on Behalf of the Petitioner

224 A.D. 730·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1928·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of the Application of Moses Valentine to Compel Samuel D. Lasky, Attorney and Counsellor-at-Law, to Turn over to the Petitioner Certain Moneys in the Possession of the Respondent, and to Determine What Lien, if Any, the Respondent Has for Legal Services Rendered on Behalf of the Petitioner. [MAJORITY] Motion denied. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and O’Malley, JJ.