Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Floyd Bailey et al., Respondents, v. John T. Martin, Appellant, 1875 — 65 N.Y. 558 · caselaw · US
General
Floyd Bailey et al., Respondents, v. John T. Martin, Appellant
65 N.Y. 558·New York Commission of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Floyd Bailey et al., Respondents, v. John T. Martin, Appellant.
(Argued January 5, 1875;
decided May term, 1875.)
The opinion in this case was not handed down.
A. J. Yojnderjpoel for the appellant.
G. W. Fullerton for the respondents.
[MAJORITY — Gray, C.,]
Gray, C.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Dwight, 0., who favors a modification as to amount of judgment.
Judgment affirmed