Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bonet, Treasurer of Puerto Rico, v. Yabucoa Sugar Co., 1939 — 307 U.S. 613 · caselaw · US
Tax
Bonet, Treasurer of Puerto Rico, v. Yabucoa Sugar Co.
307 U.S. 613·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 498.
Bonet, Treasurer of Puerto Rico, v. Yabucoa Sugar Co.
May 22, 1939.
[MAJORITY]
The opinion of the Court announced Ma,rch 27, 1939, is amended in the following particulars:
■In the first complete sentence on page 3, the word “refund” is stricken and the word “relief” inserted in lieu thereof, and omission of quoted matter in the third complete sentence is indicated, so that the first three sentences will read: “Such a taxpayer can sue at law under these sections only if he has been ■ denied relief by both the Treasurer and the Board of Review and Equalization of the Island. But these sections nowhere expressly authorize appeal from the Treasurer to the Board by one who paid taxes without protest. And § 76 (b), which the Circuit Court of Appeals interpreted as authorizing suit by a taxpayer who paid without protest, expressly prohibits suit in court ‘until a claim for refund or credit has been duly filed with . . the Board of Review and Equalization on appeal, according to the provisions of law in that regard, and the regulations established in pursuance thereof.’ ”
The petition for rehearing is denied.