Criminal Law · MBE-tested

Joseph O'NEAL v. STATE of Arkansas

320 Ark. 343896 S.W.2d 592·Arkansas Supreme Court·1995·AR

Dudley, J., not participating.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Joseph O’NEAL v. STATE of Arkansas CR 95-148 896 S.W.2d 592(2) Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 10, 1995 Joseph P. Mazzanti III, for appellant. No response. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Appellant, Joseph O’Neal, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Joseph P. Mazzanti, III, accepts full responsibility for failing to file the record on time. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Dudley, J., not participating.