Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John F. Schepeler, Respondent, v. Henry Eisner, Appellant, 1873 — 54 N.Y. 675 · caselaw · US
General
John F. Schepeler, Respondent, v. Henry Eisner, Appellant
54 N.Y. 675·New York Commission of Appeals·1873·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John F. Schepeler, Respondent, v. Henry Eisner, Appellant.
(Argued June 19, 1873;
decided September term, 1873.)
Decided on the facts in the case.
J. E. Burrill for the appellant.
Samuel Hand for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Johnson, C.,]
Johnson, C.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.