Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Keriakos et al. v. Hunt et al., 1970 — 400 U.S. 929 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Keriakos et al. v. Hunt et al.
400 U.S. 929·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part, in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 601.
Keriakos et al. v. Hunt et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Blackmun, for the reasons expressed in their separate opinions in Cain v. Kentucky, 397 U. S. 319 (1970), Walker v. Ohio, 398 U. S. 434 (1970) (The Chief Justice) ; Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496 (1957), Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U. S. 184, 203 (1964), Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455 (1966) (Mr. Justice Harlan); and Hoyt v. Minnesota, 399 U. S. 524 (1970) (Mr. Justice Blackmun), would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment below, and remand the case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the other issues tendered by petitioners.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part, in the consideration or decision of this petition.