Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Daniels et al. v. Allen, Warden; Speller v. Allen, Warden; Brown v. Allen, Warden; United States ex rel. Smith v. Baldi, Superintendent, 1952 — 343 U.S. 973 · caselaw · US
General
Daniels et al. v. Allen, Warden; Speller v. Allen, Warden; Brown v. Allen, Warden; United States ex rel. Smith v. Baldi, Superintendent
343 U.S. 973·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 626.
No. 643.
No. 670.
No. 669.
Daniels et al. v. Allen, Warden Speller v. Allen, Warden Brown v. Allen, Warden United States ex rel. Smith v. Baldi, Superintendent
argued April 28, 1952;
argued April 29, 1952;
argued April 29, 1952;
argued April 29-30, 1952.
[MAJORITY]
(certiorari granted, 342 U. S. 941),
(certiorari granted, 342 U. S. 953),
(certiorari granted, 343 U. S. 903),
and
(certiorari granted, 343 U. S. 903),
These cases are ordered restored to the docket for reargument and are assigned for hearing at the head of the call for Monday, October 13th.