General
Albert Dickinson Company v. United States
35 Cust. Ct. 359·United States Customs Court·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the Third Division,
December 20, 1955
No. 59603.
protest 257007-K (New York).
Albert Dickinson Company v. United States,
[MAJORITY — Ekwall, J.]
Opinion by
Ekwall, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bird’s-foot trefoil seed similar in all material respects to that the subject of Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport, Incorporated) v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[DISSENT — Donlon, J.,]
Donlon, J.,
dissented, holding: “I do not concur in the decision in Transcontinental Seed, Inc. v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462, the record of which has been incorporated in the record of this case. In my opinion, the protest should be overruled.”