Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Georgia Public Service Commission, 1962 — 369 U.S. 882 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Georgia Public Service Commission
369 U.S. 882·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
May 21, 1962.
No. 794.
United States v. Georgia Public Service Commission.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Richard A. Solomon for the United States.
Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, and Paul Rodgers, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Me. Justice FeaNKpurteR took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders were this day announced.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction is postponed until a hearing of the case on the merits. Counsel are requested to brief and argue, in addition to the merits, the question of this Court’s jurisdiction on direct appeal under 28 U. S. C. § 1253; see 28 U. S. C. § 2281; cf. Kesler v. Department of Public Safety, 369 U. S. 153, 155-158.