General
Charles Stroh, Respondent, v. Patricia Gross, Appellant
269 A.D.2d 384702 N.Y.S.2d 874·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2000·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Stroh, Respondent, v Patricia Gross, Appellant.
[702 NYS2d 874]
[MAJORITY]
—In an action, inter alia, for an injunption enjoining certain construction on the defendant’s property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Newmark, J.), dated September 30, 1997, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant’s contentions have been rendered academic by a subsequent order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), dated January 26, 1999 (see, Stroh v Gross [appeal No. 63], 269 AD2d 384 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.