General
William H. Rutty, Respondent, v. Consolidated Fruit Jar Company, Appellant
126 N.Y. 639·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William H. Rutty, Respondent, v. Consolidated Fruit Jar Company, Appellant.
(Argued March 6, 1891;
decided March 20, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made January 2, 1891, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict directed by the court and .affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial,
L. A. Fulleo' for appellant.
John F. Fustis for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
•Judgment affirmed.