General
Bruce E. Loomis, Respondent, v. Henry W. Marsh and Another, Copartners, etc., Appellants
211 A.D. 867·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1924·NY
Rich, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Kelly, P. J., and Manning, J., vote to further modify the order by eliminating the requirements in subdivisions 4, 5 and 6 of said notice.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bruce E. Loomis, Respondent, v. Henry W. Marsh and Another, Copartners, etc., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order denying motion to vacate notice of examination modified so as to eliminate the requirement (Subd. 7) that defendant produce books, papers and documents upon the examination, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.
Rich, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Kelly, P. J., and Manning, J., vote to further modify the order by eliminating the requirements in subdivisions 4, 5 and 6 of said notice.