General
In the Matter of Justine L. Lambert, Appellant-Respondent, against E. John Ernst, Jr., Respondent-Appellant
268 A.D. 771·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1944·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Justine L. Lambert, Appellant-Respondent, against E. John Ernst, Jr., Respondent-Appellant.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Respondent-appellant concedes that petitioner-appellant is entitled to" an order granting substitution of attorneys in pending cases. The question as to the right of respondent-appellant to a retaining lien, in the present state of the record, was properly determined.
The order should, accordingly, be modified to the extent of granting substitution and as so modified affirmed, without costs.
Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
Order unanimously modified to the extent of granting substitution of attorneys, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.