Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lula Anthony, by Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. The Village of Glens Falls, Respondent, 1897 — 153 N.Y. 682 · caselaw · US
General
Lula Anthony, by Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. The Village of Glens Falls, Respondent
153 N.Y. 682·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lula Anthony, by Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. The Village of Glens Falls, Respondent.
Anthony v. Village of Glens Falls, 4 App. Div. 218, affirmed.
(Argued June 17, 1897;
decided October 5, 1897.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered April 21, 1896,. which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and granted a new trial.
Richard L. Hand for appellant.
James H. Bain for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order and judgment affirmed, and judgment absolute ordered against plaintiff, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Gbay, J., absent.