General

Oliver CULPEPPER v. STATE

24 Ala. App. 625129 So. 923·Alabama Court of Appeals·1930·AL

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

(129 So. 923) Oliver CULPEPPER v. STATE. 7 Div. 645. Court of Appeals of Alabama. June 30, 1930. C. A. Wolfes, of Ft. Payne, for appellant. Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State. [MAJORITY — SAMFORD, J.] SAMFORD, J. The evidence was in conflict, and there is no such preponderance in favor of defendant as would authorize this court to hold that the trial judge committed error in overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial. Questions arising on rulings on demurrer are settled against defendant in Williams v. State, 23 Ala. App. 53, 122 So. 460, Dixon v. State, 23 Ala. App. 279, 124 So. 506. and Weaver v. State, 23 Ala. App. 353, 125 So. 800. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.