Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lawrence Brothers, Incorporated, Respondent, v. Henry B. Heylman, Defendant, and Harriet A. Heylman, Appellant, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 573 · caselaw · US
General
Lawrence Brothers, Incorporated, Respondent, v. Henry B. Heylman, Defendant, and Harriet A. Heylman, Appellant
189 N.Y. 573·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lawrence Brothers, Incorporated, Respondent, v. Henry B. Heylman, Defendant, and Harriet A. Heylman, Appellant.
Lawrence Brothers, Inc., v. Heylman, 111 App. Div. 848, affirmed.
(Argued October 17, 1907;
decided November 1, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment, entered September 12, 1906, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term adjudging a conveyance of real estate made by defendant Henry B. Heylman to defendant Harriet A. Heylman to be a mortgage, and that the equity of redemption is subject to the lien of a certain judgment in plaintiff’s favor against the said Henry B. Heylman.
Richard Krause for appellant.
Ralph Karl Prime, Jr., for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, , Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.