General
BENHAM v. WELLS, FARGO & CO.
98 F. 1007·United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of California·1899
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BENHAM v. WELLS, FARGO & CO.
(Circuit Court, N. D. California.
_ November 17, 1899.)
No. 12,740.
Action at law to recover damages in the sum of SoO for the alleged neglect of the defendant, as a common carrier, to receive and transport a certain package ef merchandise offered and tendered by plaintiff for conveyance and transportation.
McGowan & Squires, for plaintiff.
E. S. Pillsbury, for defendant.
[MAJORITY — MORROW, Circuit Judge.]
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
For the reasons stated in the opinion rendered to-day in the case of Johnson v. Wells, Fargo & Co. (C. C.) 98 Fed. 3, this cause will be remanded to the justice’s court of the city and county of San Francisco, state of California.