Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Parke, Davis & Co. v. Cook, Commissioner of Revenue, 1945 — 323 U.S. 681 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Parke, Davis & Co. v. Cook, Commissioner of Revenue
323 U.S. 681·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 713.
Parke, Davis & Co. v. Cook, Commissioner of Revenue.
January 2, 1945.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Chamberlain, 254 U. S. 113, 120-21, and cases cited; International Harvester Co. v. Wisconsin Department of Taxation, 322 U. S. 435, 441-42; (2) Union Tank Line Co. v. Wright, 249 U. S. 275, 282; Nashville, C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Browning, 310 U. S. 362, 365-66; (3) Interna tional Harvester Co. v. Department of Treasury, 322 U. S. 340; Department of Treasury v. Wood Corporation, 313 U. S. 62; cf. McLeod v. Dilworth Co., 322 U. S. 327.
Messrs. B. D. Murphy and Edgar Watkins for appellant.
Messrs. T. Grady Head, Attorney General of Georgia, Claude Shaw and Victor Davidson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.