General
Harry M. Schaffer, Appellant, v. City Bank Farmers Trust Company, Respondent, and Howard C. Lake, Defendant
245 A.D. 780·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1935·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Harry M. Schaffer, Appellant, v. City Bank Farmers Trust Company, Respondent, and Howard C. Lake, Defendant.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The court certifies that a question of law has arisen which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals, which question is hereby certified as follows: Is this action properly referable under section 466 of the Civil Practice Act? Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ. [See 244 App. Div. 463.]