Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louis Bajus, Appellant, v. The Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Railroad Company, Respondent, 1890 — 119 N.Y. 651 · caselaw · US
General
Louis Bajus, Appellant, v. The Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Railroad Company, Respondent
119 N.Y. 651·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis Bajus, Appellant, v. The Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued February 27, 1890;
decided March 18, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made January 19, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon an order nonsuiting plaintiff on trial.
W. R. Goodelle, for appellant.
Louis Marshall for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, excepting Ruger, Ch. J., not sitting, and Andrews, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.