Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
BROTHERHOOD OF SLEEPING CAR PORTERS v. PULLMAN COMPANY, 1934 — 71 F.2d 999 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
BROTHERHOOD OF SLEEPING CAR PORTERS v. PULLMAN COMPANY
71 F.2d 999·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BROTHERHOOD OF SLEEPING CAR PORTERS v. PULLMAN COMPANY.
No. 5239.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
June 22, 1934.
Walter J. Lynch and C. Francis Stradford, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
G. A. Kelly, of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Before ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Now this day come the parties by their counsel and present and file a stipulation to dismiss this appeal, which said stipulation is in the words and figures following, to wit: “It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties hereto-, through their respective solicitors, that the appeal of the plaintiff from the decree entered in the above-entitled cause be dismissed and that no costs be assessed against the plaintiff (appellant).”
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed pursuant to the above stipulation.