Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Saul SIMON, Appellant, v. VOGUE SILK HOSIERY CO. et al., etc., 1933 — 67 F.2d 1010 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Saul SIMON, Appellant, v. VOGUE SILK HOSIERY CO. et al., etc.
67 F.2d 1010·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Saul SIMON, Appellant, v. VOGUE SILK HOSIERY CO. et al., etc.
No. 5114.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Dec. 26, 1933.
Samuel Milberg, of Jersey City, N. J., for appellant.
Shelton Pitney and William H. Osborne, Jr., both of Newark, N.-J., for appellees.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.]
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
In this bankruptcy ease the referee found the alleged bankrupt was insolvent. On certification of that question, the court approved the referee’s finding. Thereupon this appeal was taken.
After due consideration of the record and briefs, we are satisfied no error was committed by the referee or the court below, and as no question of principle or practice is concerned, we limit ourselves to affirming the court’s decree.
No opinion filed.