Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Lance, Incorporated; and United States v. Lovknit Manufacturing Co., Inc. et al., 1952 — 342 U.S. 915 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Lance, Incorporated; and United States v. Lovknit Manufacturing Co., Inc. et al.
342 U.S. 915·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 293.
No. 294.
United States v. Lance, Incorporated; and United States v. Lovknit Manufacturing Co., Inc. et al.,
[MAJORITY]
ante, p. 896. The motion for leave to file brief of Congress of Industrial' Organizations, as amicus curiae, is denied. The petition for rehearing is denied.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter joins the Court in denying the motion of the Congress of Industrial Organizations for leave to file a brief amicus curiae, but desires to add the following:
The United States, like any other party to a litigation, may refuse consent for any reason or no reason, selectively or uniformly, to the filing of a brief here on behalf of an amicus curiae. But such action by the Solicitor General is to be deemed to be taken entirely at his discretion, in no wise governed by a rule of this Court or the policy underlying it.