Criminal Law · MBE-tested

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lateef Taylor, Appellant

253 A.D.2d 776677 N.Y.S.2d 490·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1998·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lateef Taylor, Appellant. [677 NYS2d 490] [MAJORITY] Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), both rendered January 26, 1996, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 95-00379 and burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 95-00445, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Ordered that the judgments are affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.