Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas Rae, Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Respondents, 1875 — 62 N.Y. 631 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas Rae, Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Respondents
62 N.Y. 631·New York Court of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas Rae, Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Respondents.
(Argued June 8, 1875;
decided June 15, 1875.)
This was an appeal from an order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Few York, affirming an order of Special Term dissolving a preliminary injunction. Held, not appealable. (Paul v. Hunger, 47 N. Y., 469; People v. Schoonmaker, 50 id., 499.)
Irving Ward for the appellant.
William Barnes for the respondents.
[MAJORITY — Allen, J.,]
Allen, J.,
reads for dismissal of appeal.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.