General
Pacific Creosoting Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States
231 U.S. 737·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 520.
Pacific Creosoting Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States.
In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Motion to dismiss submitted October 27, 1913.
Decided November 3, 1913.
Mr. George E. de Steiguer for the plaintiff in error. The Attorney General, The Solicitor General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Adkins for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Anglo-Californian Bank v. United States, 175 U. S. 37; Macfadden v. United States, 213 U. S. 288, 294.