Criminal Law · MBE-tested
HUNDLEY v. CITY OF HUNTSVILLE
23 Ala. App. 451126 So. 616·Alabama Court of Appeals·1930·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(126 So. 616)
HUNDLEY v. CITY OF HUNTSVILLE.
8 Div. 867.
Court of Appeals of Alabama.
March 4, 1930.
Watts & White, of Huntsville, for appellant.
Jas. H. Pride, of Huntsville, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — SAMFORD, J.]
SAMFORD, J.
Defendant was charged with the violation of a city ordinance, and, on judgment being rendered against him in the circuit court on appeal from the recorder’s court, he appeals.
This is a quasi criminal cause, in which assignments of error must conform to rule 1 of the Supreme Court. There is no such conformity, and the judgment is affirmed. Childs v. City of Birmingham, 19 Ala. App. 71, 94 So. 790; Casteel v. City of Decatur, 215 Ala. 4, 109 So. 571.
Affirmed.