Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
American Medical Association v. United States; and Medical Society of the District of Columbia v. United States, 1942 — 317 U.S. 613 · caselaw · US
General
American Medical Association v. United States; and Medical Society of the District of Columbia v. United States
317 U.S. 613·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 201.
American Medical Association v. United States; and Medical Society of the District of Columbia v. United States.
No. 202.
October 12, 1942.
Messrs. Edward M. Burke, William E. Leahy, Seth W. Richardson, and Charles S. Baker for petitioners. Assistant Attorney General Arnold and Messrs. Oscar Cox, John Henry Lewin, and Grant W. Kelleher for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted limited to the first three questions presented by the petition.