Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
California v. United States, 1963 — 372 U.S. 941 · caselaw · US
General
California v. United States
372 U.S. 941·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 666.
California v. United States.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and John Fourt and Robert-H. Connett, Deputy Attorneys General, for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Guiljoyle and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.