Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John KOVALSKY, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error, 1926 — 12 F.2d 1016 · caselaw · US
General
John KOVALSKY, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
12 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John KOVALSKY, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 17, 1926.)
No. 328.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
Frederick W. Lahr, of St. George, S. I., N. Y., for plaintiff in error.
William A. De Groot, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y. (H. H. Kellogg, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for the United States.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed.