General
Marvin Urist, by His Guardian ad Litem, Herman Urist, et al., Respondents, v. Seaboard Freight Lines, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants
269 A.D. 662·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1945·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Marvin Urist, by His Guardian ad Litem, Herman Urist, et al., Respondents, v. Seaboard Freight Lines, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Martin, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict is against the overwhelming weight of the credible evidence. In addition, reversible error was committed by the court in its charge.