General
Odette L. Rhee, Respondent-Appellant, v. Douglas Rhee et al., Appellants-Respondents
82 A.D.2d 731·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1981·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Odette L. Rhee, Respondent-Appellant, v Douglas Rhee et al., Appellants-Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Fraiman, J.), entered on June 4, 1980, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Concur — Ross, J.P., Markewich, Fein and Lynch, JJ.
Bloom, J., concurs in a memorandum as follows: If, as defendant contends, the judgment entered after trial, insofar as it deals with the disposition of the proceeds to be realized upon the sale of the Hawaiian property, fails to accurately reflect the decision of the trial court, the appropriate remedy is an application to resettle the judgment. In all other respects I agree with the determination of the Trial Judge.