Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brainslawa SZCZEPANSKI, General Administratrix of the Estate of Karl Szczepanski, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee, 1930 — 36 F.2d 1022 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Brainslawa SZCZEPANSKI, General Administratrix of the Estate of Karl Szczepanski, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
36 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Brainslawa SZCZEPANSKI, General Administratrix of the Estate of Karl Szczepanski, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
January 14, 1930.
No. 4115.
Alex R. DeSevo, of Jersey City, N. J. (Alex Simpson, of Jersey City, N. J., of counsel), for appellant.
John A. Hartpence, of Jersey City, N. J., for appellee.
Before WOOLLEY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed, on authority of Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. Thirouin (C. C. A.) 9 F.(2d) 856, 858.