General

Emil Horwitz, Respondent, v. John Richards Sofio and Sophreda, Limited, Defendants, Impleaded with John R. Sofio & Partners, Limited, Appellant; Mitchell R. Basker, Respondent, v. John Richards Sofio and Sophreda, Limited, Defendants, Impleaded with John R. Sofio & Partners, Limited, Appellant

251 A.D. 713·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1937·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Emil Horwitz, Respondent, v. John Richards Sofio and Sophreda, Limited, Defendants, Impleaded with John R. Sofio & Partners, Limited, Appellant. Mitchell R. Basker, Respondent, v. John Richards Sofio and Sophreda, Limited, Defendants, Impleaded with John R. Sofio & Partners, Limited, Appellant. [MAJORITY] Orders unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.