Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ann E. Maytham, Respondent, v. The Travelers' Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, Appellant, 1898 — 156 N.Y. 667 · caselaw · US
General
Ann E. Maytham, Respondent, v. The Travelers' Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, Appellant
156 N.Y. 667·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ann E. Maytham, Respondent, v. The Travelers' Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, Appellant.
Maytham v. Travelers’ Lis. Go., 88 Hun, 616, affirmed.
(Argued May 9, 1898;
decided June 7, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered June 25, 1895, upon an order affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Clinton B. Gibbs for appellant.
William Burnet Wright, Jr., for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.