Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
State of KANSAS, plaintiff, v. State of NEBRASKA and State of Colorado., 2013 — 569 U.S. 916 · caselaw · US
General
State of KANSAS, plaintiff, v. State of NEBRASKA and State of Colorado.
569 U.S. 916185 L. Ed. 2d 809·Supreme Court of the United States·2013
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
State of KANSAS, plaintiff,
v.
State of NEBRASKA and State of Colorado.
No. 126, Original.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 15, 2013.
Motion of Special Master for allowance of fees and disbursements for the period August 24, 2012, through March 7, 2013, granted. The Special Master is awarded a total of $246,328.05 for the period August 24, 2012, through March 7, 2013, to be allocated among the states as follows: Kansas $98,531.22; Nebraska $98,531.22; and Colorado $49,265.61.