Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alford D. EMBRY, Jr., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES, 2020 — 140 S. Ct. 1247 · caselaw · US
General
Alford D. EMBRY, Jr., Petitioner v. UNITED STATES
140 S. Ct. 1247206 L. Ed. 2d 242·Supreme Court of the United States·2020
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alford D. EMBRY, Jr., Petitioner
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 19-7412
Supreme Court of the United States.
February 24, 2020
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari:
I dissent for the reasons set out in Brown v. United States , 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14, 202 L.Ed.2d 302 (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).